Our Music Video

Our Band Website

Our Band Website
Click on the image to get to the website

Our Album Digipak- Back and Front

Our Album Digipak- Back and Front

Our Album Digipak- Middle

Our Album Digipak- Middle

Monday 14 October 2013

Dexter Evaluation Questions

1. Summarise the conventions of title sequences that were most important to this task.

Title sequences need to show the names of actors, directors, producers in the short space of a few minuets, in the lead up to the film or tv show. They are usually integrated within the shots, which are often montage style and connote theme of the genre and hint at story. They are sometimes exciting and imaginatively placed into the sequence, for us this convention was the most important in this task.

2. How did your group plan to edit the title sequence? (consider timings, industry requirements etc).

We watched through the title-less opening and talked through good opportunities to place titles. We then worked in chronological order, using the programme Live Fonts to create the titles and place them into the clip. When using transitions such as fades and disperse we had to consider timings to make it work best with the footage.

 3. Explain the creative decisions made by your group.

We had to consider how the size and shapes of the titles would fit into the shot; where they would stand out.

4. How does your re-edit compare to the original?

The original has no transitions or effects whereas we integrated these at every opportunity. I think this is because the original has titles in almost ever shot and effects would be distracting for the viewer.

Here is our edited version:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnqrXNqtzSI

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well done, Mari. Your homework posts have all been presented to a very high standard and you have shown very good theoretical understanding in each task. One point to make is that some answers are quite brief, and your writing can be overly descriptive rather than analytical. You could try to use more evidence to support your points. Your technical terminology is frequent and accurate. You are making very good progress, so please maintain this high standard of work.

    ReplyDelete